Gender & Pregnancy Discrimination

Gender and pregnancy discrimination can result in unfair treatment in the workplace. Although the Equal Pay Act has been on the books for over 40 years, recent studies have shown that women continue to be paid less than men for performing the same work. 

According to a 2003 study by the U.S. Department of Labor, women make 78% of men’s wages across the board. Most surprising, the wage disparity is greatest among the most highly educated groups.

North Carolina Gender & Pregnancy Employment Law

Employers have developed fairly standard arguments to evade liability for North Carolina gender and pregnancy employment laws. 

For example, employers routinely try to distinguish the work performed by a female employee and her male counterparts by arguing that the male employees’ jobs require more skill. Employers also try to identify something in the male employee’s background or resume that distinguishes him from the female employee in order to justify his higher wage. 

Luckily there are employment laws that protect employees from pregnancy and gender discrimination.

The Equal Pay Act and Gender Discrimination

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 prohibits employers from paying unequal pay to women for equal work. The Act prohibits discrimination with respect to wages, which includes base salary, bonuses, stock options, profit sharing and other fringe benefits.

The Act does not require that a female employee show that the equal pay and wage discrimination was intentional or based on her gender; she need only show that there is a pay disparity, i.e. that a male employee at the same company is paid a higher “wage” for performing substantially equal work.

Pregnancy Discrimination Violates Multiple Laws

Pregnancy discrimination is a form of gender discrimination, which was made illegal in the workplace with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Later laws, such as the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), also ensure that America’s working women don’t have to face serious negative career repercussions due to pregnancy.

In addition, pregnancy discrimination can also be construed in some circumstances to violate provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This is not to say that pregnancy is classified as a “disability” per se, but if your employer perceives pregnancy as being a disability and then makes discriminatory decisions based on that perception, that’s illegal.

Pregnancy Discrimination Services in North Carolina

In recent years, pregnancy discrimination has been on the rise. Pregnancy discrimination is one of the most offensive forms of discrimination, and we emphasize this area of law in our practice.

The Subtle Forms of Pregnancy Discrimination

If your employer perceives pregnancy to be a disability, then he or she may make discriminatory decisions in an effort to accommodate you. In some forms, this can be helpful and maybe even welcome. In other forms, it can harm your career.

For example, many women report being stripped of their primary job responsibilities during pregnancy. The employer may just be trying to reduce the stress and workload of the pregnant employee, but the employee has lost the opportunity to perform and, in many ways, to advance in her career.

Read Articles related to Gender DISCRIMINATION

Former CPCC Associate Vice President Sues College For Discrimination

Carolyn White, former Central Piedmont Community College associate vice president, is suing the college for gender and age discrimination after she and a dozen other female staff members over the age of 40 were laid off in 2017.
Law360 Logo

Van Kampen Law Client Robinson Bradshaw Calls Plaintiff’s Brief Outlandish

Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson PA and Van Kampen Law fired back Thursday against a black female attorney’s court filing accusing the law firm of using racial stereotypes in its efforts to escape her bias suit against it, saying the attorney “caustically embellishes the most outlandish allegations of her complaint.”
Law360 Logo

Van Kampen Law Hired to Represent Defense Firm Robinson Bradshaw

Sharika M. Robinson, who joined the Carolinas-based Robinson Bradshaw as an associate in 2015, accused the firm in her suit last month of engaging in a pattern of gender and racial discrimination that belies its public marketing to prospective clients and employees as being committed to diversity and inclusion.